Chapter 9 Case for Jefferson County, AL

Published on:
November 17, 2011

SIFMA provides comments to the U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Southern District, in the Chapter 9 Case for Jefferson County, Alabama.  SIFMA addresses the potential consequential market implications associated with the precedent of a court disrupting state-appointed receiver arrangements.  There are broader systemic issues related to this action.  If the bankruptcy court violates the bond indenture it would call into question security and collateral arrangements for revenue bonds generally.  One key to the viability of infrastructure financing in the United States is the assurance to those who buy revenue bonds secured by special revenues that the promise of revenue will continue under the Bankruptcy Code and will be paid even if the municipality files a bankruptcy proceeding.  A contrary ruling as proposed would have far reaching implications and SIFMA believes it prudent that the court consider those implications.

Details

More Content

  • Amicus Briefs
    Oct 05, 2026

    In re The Boeing Company Securities Litigation

  • Letters
    Oct 05, 2026

    Reducing Duplicative Regulation and Expanding Exemptions for Commodity Pool Operators and Commodity Trading Advisors

    SIFMA AMG comments on CFTC proposals to reduce duplicative regulation for certain CPOs and CTAs and account for inflation.
  • Letters
    Sep 30, 2026

    Proposed Rule Change to Amend FINRA Rules 0150, 2165, 4512 and to Adopt FINRA Rule 2166

    SIFMA Comments to SEC in support of the proposed rule changes to improve the utilization of Rules 2165 and 4512, as well as the new Rule 2166 to allow for a temporary delay for suspected fraud.

Get the latest trends, stats, and research on financial markets and securities.