Fiduciary Rule Proposal – Best Interest Contract Exemption (BIC exemption)

SIFMA is pleased to provide comments regarding the Department of Labor’s (“Department”) Proposed Best Interest Contract Exemption (“BIC Exemption”) under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (“ERISA”). We appreciate the opportunity to comment and hope that our comments are helpful to the Department as it assesses whether the exemption, as written, can be accommodated into the broker-dealer model that exists today, or whether, as written, it will result in the loss of professional investment advice for small retirement accounts.

Although the preamble states that the proposed BIC Exemption “seeks to preserve beneficial business models by taking a standards-based approach that will broadly permit firms to continue to rely on common fee practices,” the exemption as currently proposed raises significant and in many respects insurmountable obstacles for broker-dealers, including the ability to offer commission-based advice.

SIFMA shares the Department’s interest in ensuring that investors receive appropriate, informed assistance with decisions concerning retirement. However, SIFMA respectfully believes that this proposed exemption, and the package of proposals accompanying it, are not the proper way of proceeding. SIFMA also does not believe that the Department may use a new definition of “fiduciary,” in combination with its exemptive authority, as a means of establishing a new regulatory and enforcement program for financial professionals, ERISA plans, and non-ERISA plans such as IRAs. SIFMA expresses this objection with regard to the BIC Exemption, and the other, related exemptive rules that have been proposed.

See Also:

United States Department of Labor: Conflict of Interest Proposed Rule

See Also:

Details

Download

More Content

  • Letters
    Mar 30, 2026

    Automated Market Makers and the Consistent Application of Securities Market Regulations

    SIFMA comments to the SEC Crypto Task Force highlight key AMM considerations for tokenized securities and the need for tech-neutral safeguards.
  • Letters
    Mar 27, 2026

    Protecting New York’s Economy: Coalition Urges Rejection of FY27 Tax Increase Package

    Coalition urges rejecting FY2027 tax hikes, warning they would raise costs, hurt competitiveness, and weaken New York’s economy.
  • Amicus Briefs
    Mar 25, 2026

    Optimum Communications v. Apollo, et al.

Get the latest trends, stats, and research on financial markets and securities.