Enhanced Financed Emission Disclosures (SIFMA, CBA, ABA, and BPI)

Published on:
August 17, 2022
Submitted to:
California State Assembly
Submitted by:
SIFMA, CBA, ABA, and BPI

Summary

SIFMA, California Bankers Association (CBA), American Bankers Association (ABA), and Bank Policy Institute (BPI) provided comments to the California State Assembly on the inclusion of financed emissions in the disclosure requirements contemplated in SB 260, the Climate Corporate Accountability Act (CCAA).

Excerpt

August 17, 2022

Assembly Floor Alert

TO: All members, California State Assembly

FROM: California Bankers Association

American Bankers Association

Bank Policy Institute

Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association

RE: Opposition to Senate Bill 260 (Wiener): Climate Corporate Accountability Act

We are writing to express concern regarding the inclusion of financed emissions in the disclosure requirements contemplated in SB 260, the Climate Corporate Accountability Act (CCAA), as well as to highlight the high potential for conflict between the bill and climate disclosure regimes currently pending at the federal and international level.

As currently drafted, SB 260 creates a corporate disclosure regime designed to provide emission information to the general public. The bill would require U.S. companies doing business in California to disclose annually audited amounts of Scope 1, 2, and 3 greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs) in accordance with the Greenhouse Gas Protocol (GHG Protocol).1 SB 260 differs from, but is being considered at the same time as the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) proposal to require GHG disclosures to help investors assess climate-related risk. In addition, significant efforts are underway internationally through the International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) of the International Financial Reporting Standards Foundation (IFRS) – in which the SEC is contributing – to create detailed, global climate disclosure requirements that are consistent and interoperable for public companies in the United States and other jurisdictions around the world, including those European countries, that already have climate disclosure requirements for public companies. There is a high potential for conflict between California’s GHG disclosure requirements and the anticipated final SEC regulations and ISSB standards.

Continue Reading

1 The GHG Protocol was originally issued in 2001 by the World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD) and World Resources Institute (WRI).

Details

Download

More Content

  • Letters
    Dec 19, 2025

    Prohibition on the Use of Reserve Funds by the Consolidated Audit Trail National Market System Plan

    SIFMA submitted a letter to the SEC opposing the proposed amendment to the CAT NMS Plan, which seeks to readopt a vacated funding model. They argue that using reserves built under the invalid model for CAT funding is unlawful and contradicts the court's decision. SIFMA recommends holding reserves in escrow until a new funding path is established.
  • Letters
    Dec 16, 2025

    Regulation of Tokenized Securities Markets (SIFMA and SIFMA AMG)

    SIFMA and SIFMA AMG provided feedback to the SEC Crypto Task Force, emphasizing the need for regulatory frameworks for blockchain-based digital assets.
  • Letters
    Dec 05, 2025

    The INVEST Act

Get the latest trends, stats, and research on financial markets and securities.