Arbitration Fairness Act

Published on:
February 7, 2008
Submitted to:
U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee
Submitted by:
SIFMA

SIFMA, as part of the Coalition to Preserve Arbitration, provides comments to the leadership of the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee strongly opposing the Arbitration Fairness Act (S.1782). The Coalition feels the legislation would retroactively declare unenforceable potentially millions of existing arbitration provisions and would prohibit the use of pre-dispute arbitration agreements in consumer, employment, brokerage, and franchise contracts. In addition, it would call into question arbitration agreements relating to “contracts or transactions between parties of unequal bargaining power.” The bill will effectively raise the cost of dispute resolution for both consumers and businesses and eliminate the ability of consumers and employees to obtain redress for many types of wrongdoing, and increase the caseload of our already overburdened courts as well as the price of consumer services and products for all Americans.

Details

Download

More Content

  • Amicus Briefs
    Oct 05, 2026

    In re The Boeing Company Securities Litigation

  • Letters
    Oct 05, 2026

    Reducing Duplicative Regulation and Expanding Exemptions for Commodity Pool Operators and Commodity Trading Advisors

    SIFMA AMG comments on CFTC proposals to reduce duplicative regulation for certain CPOs and CTAs and account for inflation.
  • Letters
    Sep 30, 2026

    Proposed Rule Change to Amend FINRA Rules 0150, 2165, 4512 and to Adopt FINRA Rule 2166

    SIFMA Comments to SEC in support of the proposed rule changes to improve the utilization of Rules 2165 and 4512, as well as the new Rule 2166 to allow for a temporary delay for suspected fraud.

Get the latest trends, stats, and research on financial markets and securities.