The Joint Powers Agreement of the Homeownership Protection Plan in San Bernardino County, CA

Published on:
June 28, 2012

SIFMA and 17 other organizations provide comments to the San Bernardino County Board of Supervisors strongly objecting to the Joint Powers Agreement (JPA) that contemplates the implementation of a so-called  “Homeownership Protection Plan.” Based on publicly available information on the JPA, the groups are very concerned that the good intentions of the Board of Supervisors will instead result in significant harm to the residents the JPA intends to help.  The JPA proposes the use of eminent domain to seize mortgage loans from private investors through condemnation, in order to force a restructuring of the mortgage. The groups believe that the contemplated use of eminent domain raises very serious legal and constitutional issues.

The combined groups also sent letters to the City Council of Fontana California and the City Council of Ontario California.

Details

Download

More Content

  • Letters
    Sep 18, 2026

    Electronic Delivery of Information Under the Federal Securities Laws

    SIFMA and SIFMA AMG support the SEC’s proposed Regulation E-Delivery and recommend refinements to modernize electronic delivery requirements.
  • Letters
    Sep 11, 2026

    Request for Comment on Regulatory Notice 26-14 Proposals

    SIFMA comments on FINRA’s proposed modernization of Rule 2210, supporting a risk-based, technology-neutral approach to communications.
  • Letters
    Sep 08, 2026

    Electronic Delivery of Forms 1099-DA in Proposed Regulations and Notice 2026-4

    SIFMA comments on Treasury and IRS proposals for electronic delivery of Forms 1099-DA and other payee statements.

Get the latest trends, stats, and research on financial markets and securities.