Capital, Margin and Segregation Requirements for SBSDs and MSBSPs

Published on:
February 22, 2013

The Asset Management Group (AMG) of SIFMA provides comments to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on proposed capital, margin and segregation requirements for security-based swap (SBS) dealers and major security-based swap participants (MSBSPs), RIN 3235-AL12.

SIFMA AMG’s recommendations include:

  • SBS collateral requirements should be bilateral at the election of the non-SBS Entity counterparty.  To the extent that the CFTC requires SBS Dealers to collect collateral, the Commission should also require SBS Dealers to post collateral to a counterparty upon the election of such counterparty.
  • The amount of collateral that an SBS Dealer is required to collect from financial end user counterparties to protect against potential future exposure should vary based on the potential future exposure risk posed by the financial end user and the type of end user.
  • The margin amount calculation methodology in the Proposal should be substantially revised.
    • The CFTC should permit the use of margin models to the greatest extent possible, including allowing all SBS counterparties to use models and permitting the use of models for both debt and equity SBS.
    • Models used to calculate margin requirements should be required to include liquidation time horizons for non-cleared SBS at a 99% confidence interval over a horizon of less than ten days.
    • The CFTC should require that financial end users be able to independently verify the calculation of margin amounts.
  • A counterparty’s decision to exercise its right to third-party segregation should not result in an increased capital charge to the SBS Dealer.
  • The CFTC should ensure that all counterparty collateral held by an SBS dealer through the proposed “omnibus segregation” model be protected from the risk of default of other counterparties of the SBS dealer.

Details

Download

More Content

  • Amicus Briefs
    Oct 05, 2026

    In re The Boeing Company Securities Litigation

  • Letters
    Oct 05, 2026

    Reducing Duplicative Regulation and Expanding Exemptions for Commodity Pool Operators and Commodity Trading Advisors

    SIFMA AMG comments on CFTC proposals to reduce duplicative regulation for certain CPOs and CTAs and account for inflation.
  • Letters
    Sep 30, 2026

    Proposed Rule Change to Amend FINRA Rules 0150, 2165, 4512 and to Adopt FINRA Rule 2166

    SIFMA Comments to SEC in support of the proposed rule changes to improve the utilization of Rules 2165 and 4512, as well as the new Rule 2166 to allow for a temporary delay for suspected fraud.

Get the latest trends, stats, and research on financial markets and securities.