The Arbitration Eligibility Rule

Published on:
October 3, 1996
Submitted to:
NASD
Submitted by:
SIFMA

The Arbitration Subcommittee of the Securities Industry Association (SIA)* provides comments to the National Association of Securities Dealers (NASD) Regulation, Inc. on the NASD’s memo to members of the Securities Industry Conference on Arbitration dated August 28, 1996 regarding the eligibility rule. SIA requests the NASD reconsider its position because: 1) the interpretation is contrary to the agreement between the parties to the arbitration; 2) the interpretation is contrary to the intention of the rule and its uniform interpretation since its adoption; 3) Since this constitutes a new interpretation of an existing rule, before it can become effective it must be submitted to the Securities Exchange Commission (SEC) for approval; 4) this interpretation will increase the necessity to petition courts to resolve the question of arbitrability; and 5) this interpretation is contrary to the law as interpreted by five U.S. Circuit Courts.

*SIFMA is the product of a merger between the Securities Industry Association (SIA) and The Bond Market Association (TBMA) in 2006.

Details

Download

More Content

  • Amicus Briefs
    Oct 05, 2026

    In re The Boeing Company Securities Litigation

  • Letters
    Oct 05, 2026

    Reducing Duplicative Regulation and Expanding Exemptions for Commodity Pool Operators and Commodity Trading Advisors

    SIFMA AMG comments on CFTC proposals to reduce duplicative regulation for certain CPOs and CTAs and account for inflation.
  • Letters
    Sep 30, 2026

    Proposed Rule Change to Amend FINRA Rules 0150, 2165, 4512 and to Adopt FINRA Rule 2166

    SIFMA Comments to SEC in support of the proposed rule changes to improve the utilization of Rules 2165 and 4512, as well as the new Rule 2166 to allow for a temporary delay for suspected fraud.

Get the latest trends, stats, and research on financial markets and securities.