SEC Cross-Trading Letter

Published on:
March 29, 2019
Submitted to:
SEC
Submitted by:
SIFMA AMG

Summary

SIFMA AMG sent a request for clarification of no-action relief under Rule 17a-7.

We request that the Staff confirm that this no-action relief also allows funds to engage in cross trades of other securities, in addition to municipal securities, using a price provided by an independent pricing service. We believe that this clarification is appropriate for the reasons and subject to the conditions set forth below.

Excerpt

Paul Cellupica

Deputy Director and Chief Counsel, Division of Investment Management

Securities and Exchange Commission

100 F Street NE

Washington, DC 20549

Re: Clarification of no-action relief under Rule 17a-7

Dear Paul,

As discussed, here is an outline relating to our request for clarification of no-action relief under Rule 17a-7. We welcome the opportunity to discuss this with you further.

Part I. Requested relief

1. In no-action letters, the staff (the “Staff”) of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) has agreed that it would not recommend enforcement action to the Commission under Section 17(a) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “ICA”), if registered investment companies engage in cross trades (as defined below) under Rule 17a-7 under the ICA of municipal securities for which market quotations were not readily available using a price provided by an independent pricing service as the “current market price” of the securities, subject to certain conditions.

The no-action letters were issued to United Municipal Bond Fund (pub. avail. July 30, 1992) (the “1992 Letter”) and (pub. avail. Jan. 27, 1995) (the “1995 Letter”) and Federated Municipal Funds (pub. avail. Nov. 20, 2006) (the “2006 Letter” and, together with the 1992 Letter and the 1995 Letter, the “Letters”). We request that the Staff confirm that this no-action relief also allows funds to engage in cross trades of other securities, in addition to municipal securities, using a price provided by an independent pricing service. We believe that this clarification is appropriate for the reasons and subject to the conditions set forth below.

Continue Reading >

Details

Download

More Content

  • Letters
    Oct 22, 2026

    Treasury/IRS Notice 2026-49: Guidance on Section 324 of the SECURE 2.0 Act with Respect to Rollovers

    SIFMA supports modernizing retirement plan rollovers through standardized electronic processes, fraud safeguards and appropriate implementation timelines.
  • Amicus Briefs
    Oct 21, 2026

    In re USD LIBOR Litigation

  • Letters
    Oct 20, 2026

    SEC’s Proposed Rule Regulation Crypto Assets

    SIFMA and SIFMA AMG provide recommendations to the SEC on its proposed crypto asset regulation, addressing regulatory clarity, implementation and investor protection.

Get the latest trends, stats, and research on financial markets and securities.