Request for No-Action Relief under Broker-Dealer CIP Rule and Beneficial Ownership Requirements for Legal Entity Customers

Published on:
December 9, 2016
Submitted to:
SEC's Division of Trading and Markets
Submitted by:
SIFMA

Summary

SIFMA letter requesting the Division of Trading and Markets of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) extend the no-action relief currently in effect with respect to the reliance provisions of the customer identification program rule applicable to broker-dealers (31 C.F.R. § 1023.220) (the “CIP Rule”).

See Related: Request for No-Action Relief under Broker-Dealer Customer Identification Program Rule and Beneficial Ownership Requirements for Legal Entity Customers – December 7, 2018

Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Response: No-Action Relief under Broker-Dealer CIP Rule and Beneficial Ownership Requirements for Legal Entity Customers – December 12, 2016

Excerpt

December 9, 2016

Via Electronic Mail

Ms. Emily Westerberg Russell

Senior Special Counsel

Division of Trading and Markets

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

100 F Street, N.E.

Washington, DC 20549

Re: Request for No-Action Relief under Broker-Dealer Customer Identification Program Rule (31 C.F.R. § 1023.220) and Beneficial Ownership Requirements for Legal Entity Customers (31 C.F.R. § 1010.230)

Dear Ms. Russell:

On behalf of its member broker-dealers, the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association (“SIFMA”) hereby requests that the staff of the Division of Trading and Markets (the “Division”) of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC” or the “Commission”) extend the no-action relief currently in effect with respect to the reliance provisions of the customer identification program rule applicable to broker-dealers (31 C.F.R. § 1023.220) (the “CIP Rule”). Under the conditions of a letter dated January 9, 2015 (the “2015 No-Action Letter”), the current relief expires on January 9, 2017. Broker-dealer firms continue to rely on the no-action relief, which was originally issued in 2004, and urge the Division staff to continue to make it available.

Continue Reading >

Details

Download

More Content

  • Amicus Briefs
    Oct 05, 2026

    In re The Boeing Company Securities Litigation

  • Letters
    Oct 05, 2026

    Reducing Duplicative Regulation and Expanding Exemptions for Commodity Pool Operators and Commodity Trading Advisors

    SIFMA AMG comments on CFTC proposals to reduce duplicative regulation for certain CPOs and CTAs and account for inflation.
  • Letters
    Sep 30, 2026

    Proposed Rule Change to Amend FINRA Rules 0150, 2165, 4512 and to Adopt FINRA Rule 2166

    SIFMA Comments to SEC in support of the proposed rule changes to improve the utilization of Rules 2165 and 4512, as well as the new Rule 2166 to allow for a temporary delay for suspected fraud.

Get the latest trends, stats, and research on financial markets and securities.