Reporting of Securities Loans

Published on:
January 7, 2022
Submitted to:
SEC
Submitted by:
SIFMA
File Number:
S7-18-21

Summary

SIFMA provided comments to the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) on proposed Rule 10c-1 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, which would for the first time implement a regime requiring the reporting of identifying data and material negotiated terms of securities lending transactions, as well as other securities lending market information, to a registered national securities association, and the subsequent public dissemination by the RNSA of select securities lending transaction terms and market information.

See also: SIFMA AMG on Reporting of Securities Loans

Excerpt

January 7, 2022

By Email

Vanessa A. Countryman

Secretary

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

100 F Street, N.E.

Washington, D.C. 205499–1090

rule-comments@sec.gov

Re: Release No. 34-93613; File No. S7-18-21 Reporting of Securities Loans

Ms. Countryman:

The Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association (“SIFMA”) 1 appreciates the opportunity to comment on the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s (the “SEC” or “Commission”) release on proposed Rule 10c-1 (the “Proposed Rule”) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”), which would for the first time implement a regime requiring the reporting of identifying data and material negotiated terms of securities lending transactions, as well as other securities lending market information, to a registered national securities association (“RNSA”), and the subsequent public dissemination by the RNSA of select securities lending transaction terms and market information.2 SIFMA is supportive of the SEC’s goal of increasing transparency in the securities lending market, and has provided herein our initial recommended alternative approaches for further consideration by the Commission.

However, the Commission asked in the Proposing Release nearly 100 questions concerning the operation of the Proposed Rule and the securities lending market generally, and SIFMA feels strongly that a 30-day comment period is simply an insufficient amount of time to allow for meaningful consideration of, and comment on, the Proposed Rule, which would impose significant changes to the current securities lending market.3 In this regard, SIFMA reconfirms

Continue Reading

1 SIFMA is the leading trade association for broker-dealers, investment banks, and asset managers operating in the U.S. and global capital markets. On behalf of our members, we advocate on legislation, regulation, and business policy affecting retail and institutional investors, equity, and fixed income markets, and related products and services. We serve as an industry coordinating body to promote fair and orderly markets, informed regulatory compliance, and efficient market operations and resiliency. We also provide a forum for industry policy and professional development. SIFMA, with offices in New York and Washington, D.C., is the U.S. regional member of the Global Financial Markets Association (GFMA). For more information, visit http://www.sifma.org.

2 Reporting of Securities Loans, Exchange Act Release No. 93613 (Nov. 18, 2021), 86 FR 69802 (Dec. 8, 2021) (“Proposing Release”).

3 SIFMA and several other industry associations noted our concerns on the 30-day comment period in a letter to the Commission, and requested an extension of the comment period to allow for more fulsome consideration of the Proposed Rule; however, the Commission rejected our request. See Letter from SIFMA et al. on Reporting of  Securities Loans (Nov. 23, 2021), https://www.sec.gov/comments/s7-18-21/s71821-9402961-262828.pdf; see also 

Details

Download

More Content

  • Letters
    Dec 16, 2025

    Regulation of Tokenized Securities Markets (SIFMA and SIFMA AMG)

    SIFMA and SIFMA AMG provided feedback to the SEC Crypto Task Force, emphasizing the need for regulatory frameworks for blockchain-based digital assets.
  • Letters
    Dec 05, 2025

    The INVEST Act

  • Letters
    Dec 01, 2025

    Scenarios for the Federal Reserve Board’s 2026 Supervisory Stress Test (Joint Trades)

    Joint trade associations provide comments on the proposed scenarios for the Federal Reserve’s 2026 supervisory stress tests.

Get the latest trends, stats, and research on financial markets and securities.