OCC Guidelines Establishing Standards for Recovery Planning by Certain Large Insured National Banks, Insured Federal Savings Associations, and Insured Federal Branches

Published on:
November 5, 2018
Submitted to:
OCC
Submitted by:
BPI, SIFMA

Summary

SIFMA and the Bank Policy Institute (BPI) provide comments to the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (the OCC) on their proposed amendment to its guidelines relating to recovery planning standards for insured national banks, insured federal savings associations and insured federal branches. The recommendations provided are designed so that formal recovery planning is more aligned with the differing risk profiles of the banking organizations that are subject to the Guidelines.

Excerpt

Via Electronic Mail

Legislative and Regulatory Activities Division

Office of the Comptroller of the Currency

400 7th Street SW, Suite 3E–218

Washington, DC 20219

Docket ID OCC–2018–0028

Re: OCC Guidelines Establishing Standards for Recovery Planning by Certain Large Insured National Banks, Insured Federal Savings Associations, and Insured Federal Branches

Ladies and Gentlemen:

The Bank Policy Institute (BPI) and the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association (SIFMA and, together, the Associations) appreciate the opportunity to comment on the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency’s (the OCC) proposed amendment (the Amendment Proposal) to its guidelines relating to recovery planning standards for insured national banks, insured federal savings associations and insured federal branches (the Guidelines).

The Associations believe that:

  • it is appropriate that all insured national banks, insured federal savings associations and insured federal branches (banks) with less than $250 billion in average total consolidated assets (total assets) are released from formal recovery planning under the Guidelines;
  • the OCC should consider a tailored approach to the application of the Guidelines to banks with more than $250 billion in total assets, similar to the approach being considered for large U.S. banking organizations by the OCC in conjunction with the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the Federal Reserve) and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC);
  • the OCC should consider moving from an annual to a biennial recovery plan cycle with targeted updates for material changes or events;
  • recovery planning standards and feedback should be more transparent in the future and, given the nature of the banks subject to the Guidelines, a supervisory horizontal review of recovery plans may not be appropriate; and
  • the OCC should immediately clarify that no recovery plans are expected of banks on or after January 1, 2019 if they do not meet the $250 billion total assets threshold.

These recommendations are designed so that formal recovery planning is more aligned with the differing risk profiles of the banking organizations that are subject to the Guidelines.

Continue reading >

Details

Download

More Content

  • Amicus Briefs
    Oct 05, 2026

    In re The Boeing Company Securities Litigation

  • Letters
    Oct 05, 2026

    Reducing Duplicative Regulation and Expanding Exemptions for Commodity Pool Operators and Commodity Trading Advisors

    SIFMA AMG comments on CFTC proposals to reduce duplicative regulation for certain CPOs and CTAs and account for inflation.
  • Letters
    Sep 30, 2026

    Proposed Rule Change to Amend FINRA Rules 0150, 2165, 4512 and to Adopt FINRA Rule 2166

    SIFMA Comments to SEC in support of the proposed rule changes to improve the utilization of Rules 2165 and 4512, as well as the new Rule 2166 to allow for a temporary delay for suspected fraud.

Get the latest trends, stats, and research on financial markets and securities.