Joint Trades to DOL on 401(k) Plan Investments in Cryptocurrencies

Published on:
April 12, 2022
Submitted to:
DOL
Submitted by:
SIFMA and Other Associations

Summary

SIFMA in a joint letter with other associations provided comments to the DOL on Compliance Assistance Release 2022-01, issued by the Employee Benefits Security Administration on March 10, 2022. As you know, the subject of the CAR is “401(k) Plan Investments in ‘Cryptocurrencies.’”

Excerpt

The Honorable Ali Khawar

Acting Assistant Secretary

Department of Labor

200 Constitution Ave NW Suite N-5677

Washington, DC 20210

Dear Acting Assistant Secretary Khawar:

The undersigned organizations write with regard to Compliance Assistance Release (“CAR”) 2022-01, issued by the Employee Benefits Security Administration (“EBSA”) on March 10, 2022. As you know, the subject of the CAR is “401(k) Plan Investments in ‘Cryptocurrencies.’”

First, we wish to share that we have greatly appreciated the openness of EBSA to have informal listening sessions with stakeholders on a broad range of issues. This openness has been very helpful and has underscored EBSA’s dedication to improving the retirement system. We thank you for that. It is in the context of this openness that we write to you about CAR 2022-01 and ask respectfully that this release be withdrawn and that the Department instead develop guidance in this area through notice-and-comment rulemaking.

Please note that, at this time, we express no view on the appropriateness of retirement plan investments in cryptocurrency. Rather, as described herein, we are troubled by what we perceive to be a trend at EBSA away from rulemaking based on a robust notice and comment process, including review by the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (“OIRA”). We are very aware that the line between helpful sub-regulatory guidance and indirect rulemaking is not a clear one. But we respectfully suggest that recent sub-regulatory guidance has been more in the nature of rulemaking in need of notice and comment and OIRA review, such as with respect to recent best practices guidance, as discussed below.

We believe that this trend is not helpful to the retirement system. Not using the notice-and-comment process can undermine the quality of guidance issued, causing fiduciaries to try to apply wording found in sub-regulatory guidance that has not been informed by input from the regulated community regarding how a proposed standard, as written, might be confusing or hard to administer–or even contrary to the interest of plan participants (i.e., have an unintended effect). Moreover, we believe that this trend is inconsistent with the Administrative Procedure Act’s (“APA”) requirements regarding notice and comment and with the Administration’s requirements regarding OIRA review.

The Department’s new cryptocurrency position is inconsistent with current law, and adopted retroactively without notice and comment or OIRA review. A prominent example of this trend is the recent guidance on cryptocurrency. The closing sentence of CAR 2022-01 reads as follows:

Continue Reading

Details

Download

More Content

  • Amicus Briefs
    Oct 05, 2026

    In re The Boeing Company Securities Litigation

  • Letters
    Oct 05, 2026

    Reducing Duplicative Regulation and Expanding Exemptions for Commodity Pool Operators and Commodity Trading Advisors

    SIFMA AMG comments on CFTC proposals to reduce duplicative regulation for certain CPOs and CTAs and account for inflation.
  • Letters
    Sep 30, 2026

    Proposed Rule Change to Amend FINRA Rules 0150, 2165, 4512 and to Adopt FINRA Rule 2166

    SIFMA Comments to SEC in support of the proposed rule changes to improve the utilization of Rules 2165 and 4512, as well as the new Rule 2166 to allow for a temporary delay for suspected fraud.

Get the latest trends, stats, and research on financial markets and securities.