Joint Parliamentary Committee’s Consultation on Draft Personal Data Protection Bill (PDPB)

Published on:
February 21, 2020
Submitted to:
Parliament House Annexe
Submitted by:
SIFMA, ASIFMA

Summary

SIFMA and the Asia Securities Industry & Financial Markets Association (ASIFMA) provided comments on the impact that the draft Personal Data Protection Bill (PDPB) will have on India-based, and India-facing, banks and financial institutions.

Excerpt

21 February 2020

The Director

Lok Sabha Secretariat

Room No. 152

Parliament House Annexe

New Delhi-110001

Via Email to: jpc-datalaw@sansad.nic.in and mrs.mlekhi@sansad.nic.in

Dear Sir / Madam:

Joint Parliamentary Committee’s Consultation on Draft Personal Data Protection Bill (PDPB), 2019

The Asia Securities Industry & Financial Markets Association (ASIFMA)1 and its members are grateful for the opportunity to comment on the impact that the draft Personal Data Protection Bill (PDPB) will have on India-based, and India-facing, banks and financial institutions. ASIFMA appreciates the Joint Parliamentary Committee’s (JPC) efforts to solicit industry feedback.

We would very much appreciate an opportunity to have an in-person meeting with the JPC on the PDPB and its impact on the international financial services industry in India.

We highly admire the Indian Government’s successful and commendable efforts so far in shaping the PDPB, while consulting with the industry along the way. For reference, ASIFMA has also submitted comments on the PDPB-2018, once in January2 2018 to the Justice B.N. Srikrishna Committee, and twice in September3 2018 and August4 2019 to the Ministry for Electronics and Information Technology (MEITY).

GENERAL COMMENTS

Increasing global regulatory focus on data often stems from concerns regarding privacy and data security among non-regulated entities in the broader economy; however, in the context of already regulated financial institutions poorly targeted data localisation rules can in fact undermine the resilience and security of financial systems and institutions.

Further, incompatible new restrictions introduce conflicts of law in areas such as anti-money laundering (AML) safeguards where, for instance, international financial institutions need to share information across affiliates and jurisdictions to generate information necessary to file suspicious activity reports.

India is a key participant in the international banking ecosystem and an established and favoured outsourcing location for global banking (and non-banking) services and activities. But, compared to other jurisdictions’ approaches to allowing data mobility whilst protecting data privacy, the PDPB could threaten India’s role as a competitive outsourcing location and as a place to do business, due to the logistical and legal impediments emanating from the current PDPB proposals.

Continue Reading

Details

Download

More Content

  • Letters
    Apr 16, 2026

    Proposed Regulations Regarding Section 892 Tax Treatment

    SIFMA comments to the IRS on proposed Section 892 rules affecting taxation of foreign government investments in the U.S.
  • Amicus Briefs
    Apr 15, 2026

    In re NVIDIA Corporation Securities Litigation

  • Letters
    Apr 14, 2026

    Independent Contractor Status Under FLSA, FMLA & MSPA

    SIFMA supports DOL’s proposal to restore the 2021 rule with modifications on independent contractor status, underscoring its importance to advisors and investor choice.

Get the latest trends, stats, and research on financial markets and securities.