IRS De Minimis Error Safe Harbor

Published on:
December 17, 2018
Submitted to:
Internal Revenue Service
Submitted by:
SIFMA

Summary

SIFMA submitted comments on the proposed rulemaking to implement the Internal Revenue Service’s de minimis error safe harbor from information return and payee statement penalties (the “proposed rule”). SIFMA appreciates the previous opportunities for comment and many of the clarifications provided in the Preamble to the proposed rule, in particular the clarification that the safe harbor exception is calculated on an error-by-error basis rather than on the cumulative total of multiple errors. SIFMA agrees with the IRS conclusion that the payee election out of the safe harbor should not expire. These provisions provide necessary clarity and consistency for filers seeking to utilize the safe harbor.

Excerpt

Internal Revenue Service

CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG-118826-16)

Room 5203

P.O. Box 7604 Ben Franklin Station

Washington, DC 20224

Re: De Minimis Error Safe Harbor Exceptions to Penalties for Failure to File Correct Information Returns or Furnish Correct Payee Statements

To Whom it May Concern:

The Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association (“SIFMA”)1 appreciates the opportunity to comment on the proposed rulemaking to implement the Internal Revenue Service’s (“IRS”) de minimis error safe harbor from information return and payee statement penalties (the “proposed rule”). We value the previous opportunities for comment and appreciate many of the clarifications provided in the Preamble to the proposed rule, in particular the clarification that the safe harbor exception is calculated on an error-by-error basis rather than on the cumulative total of multiple errors, and we agreed with your conclusion that the payee election out of the safe harbor should not expire. These provisions provide necessary clarity and consistency for filers seeking to utilize the safe harbor. There are two specific concerns addressed in the Preamble to the proposed rule that SIFMA wishes to revisit and request additional clarification:

First, the proposed rule did not adopt a prior comment suggesting the payee’s ability to elect out of the de minimis safe harbor should apply on an account-by-account basis, and instead permits the payee to make the election with respect to each and every payee statement.

Continue Reading >

Details

Download

More Content

  • Amicus Briefs
    Oct 05, 2026

    In re The Boeing Company Securities Litigation

  • Letters
    Oct 05, 2026

    Reducing Duplicative Regulation and Expanding Exemptions for Commodity Pool Operators and Commodity Trading Advisors

    SIFMA AMG comments on CFTC proposals to reduce duplicative regulation for certain CPOs and CTAs and account for inflation.
  • Letters
    Sep 30, 2026

    Proposed Rule Change to Amend FINRA Rules 0150, 2165, 4512 and to Adopt FINRA Rule 2166

    SIFMA Comments to SEC in support of the proposed rule changes to improve the utilization of Rules 2165 and 4512, as well as the new Rule 2166 to allow for a temporary delay for suspected fraud.

Get the latest trends, stats, and research on financial markets and securities.