Introduction of the Uniform Treatment of Custodial Assets Act

Published on:
September 27, 2023
Submitted to:
House Financial Services Committee
Submitted by:
SIFMA

Summary

SIFMA provided comments to the House Financial Services Committee commending Congressmen Flood (R-NE), Torres (D-NY), Hill (R-AR), and Nickel (D-NC) on the introduction of the Uniform Treatment of Custodial Assets Act to address the capital treatment of digital assets held in custody at a financial institution.

Excerpt

The Honorable Patrick McHenry

Chairman

Committee on Financial Services

U.S. House of Representatives

2129 Rayburn House Office Building

Washington, DC 20515

The Honorable Maxine Waters

Ranking Member

Committee on Financial Services

U.S. House of Representatives

4340 O’Neill House Office Building

Washington, DC 20515

September 27, 2023

Re: Introduction of the Uniform Treatment of Custodial Assets Act.

Dear Chairman McHenry and Ranking Member Waters:

The Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association (“SIFMA”)[1] commends Congressmen Flood (R-NE), Torres (D-NY), Hill (R-AR), and Nickel (D-NC) on the introduction of the Uniform Treatment of Custodial Assets Act to address the capital treatment of digital assets held in custody at a financial institution.

In March 2022, the SEC published Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 121 (“SAB 121”), which imposes fundamental changes on the way financial institutions are expected to account for the custody of digital assets. Specifically, SAB 121 requires a financial institution acting as a custodian to record a liability, and to recognize a corresponding asset, on its balance sheet in the amount equal to fair value of the digital asset under custody. SAB 121’s requirement for balance sheet recognition deviates from current accounting treatment for traditional assets held in custody, which are not required to be recorded on a firm’s balance sheet. This is a critical shift, as on-balance sheet treatment would have a negative impact on capital ratios for any bank that custodies digital assets. Naturally, this has disincentivized such banks from providing custodial services to their clients for such assets.

SIFMA believes the Uniform Treatment of Custodial Assets Act represents a commonsense and bipartisan solution to a problem manufactured by the SEC. By preventing the SEC from requiring banks and certain other financial entities to recognize digital assets as liabilities on-balance sheet or from holding regulatory capital against such assets, the bill would restore the ability for banks to provide digital asset-related custody services for their clients. We commend the bill’s sponsors on their commitment to providing greater regulatory clarity, preventing market disruption and protecting customer choice.

Sincerely,

Josh Wilsusen

Executive Vice President, Advocacy

[1] SIFMA is the leading trade association for broker-dealers, investment banks and asset managers operating in the U.S. and global capital markets. On behalf of our industry’s one million employees, we advocate on legislation, regulation and business policy affecting retail and institutional investors, equity and fixed income markets and related products and services. We serve as an industry coordinating body to promote fair and orderly markets, informed regulatory compliance, and efficient market operations and resiliency. We also provide a forum for industry policy and professional development. For more information, visit http://www.sifma.org.

Details

Download

More Content

  • Letters
    Jun 01, 2026

    Whistleblower Incentives and Protections

    SIFMA provided comments in support of the Anti-Money Laundering Act of 2020’s requirement for FinCEN to establish a formalized framework for a whistleblower program.
  • Letters
    Jun 01, 2026

    Fiduciary Duties in Selecting Designated Investment Alternatives

    SIFMA and SIFMA AMG support DOL’s process-based approach and recommend updates to improve retirement access.
  • Letters
    May 29, 2026

    Opposition to The Champerty Bill (Joint Trades)

    SIFMA and joint trades oppose New York’s Champerty Bill, citing risks to sovereign debt markets and economic growth.

Get the latest trends, stats, and research on financial markets and securities.