H.R. 1815, SEC Disclosure Effectiveness Testing Act

Published on:
October 16, 2019

Summary

SIFMA submits comments to Nancy Pelosi, Speaker of the US House of Representatives, and Kevin McCarthy, Minority Leader of the US House of Representatives in regards to H.R. 1815, the “SEC Disclosure Effectiveness Testing Act.”

H.R. 1815 would impose on the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) an investor testing requirement for all past and future broker-dealer regulations, with some exceptions, about disclosure to retail investors.

Excerpt

October 16, 2019

The Honorable Nancy Pelosi

Speaker

U.S. House of Representatives

Washington, DC 20515

The Honorable Kevin McCarthy

Minority Leader

U.S. House of Representatives

Washington, DC 20515

Dear Speaker Pelosi and Leader McCarthy:

The Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association (SIFMA)1 appreciates the opportunity to comment on H.R. 1815, the “SEC Disclosure Effectiveness Testing Act.” H.R. 1815 would impose on the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) an investor testing requirement for all past and future broker-dealer regulations, with some exceptions, about disclosure to retail investors.

SIFMA appreciates and shares the interest of Representative Casten and the Committee on Financial Services in advocating for robust investor testing of retail investor disclosures. We agree that in many cases, investor testing is appropriate and makes good common sense. In fact, the SEC conducted extensive investor testing of the proposed Form CRS,2 an important component of the Regulation Best Interest rulemaking package (collectively, “Reg BI”)3 – the most comprehensive enhancement of standard of conduct rules governing broker-dealers since the enactment of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The SEC’s testing involved both a comprehensive national survey to collect information on the opinions, preferences, attitudes, and level of self-assessed comprehension of the Form CRS, as well as qualitative interviews to obtain further insights related to the reasoning and beliefs behind individuals’ attitudes toward the Form CRS.

Reg BI has been fully effective since September 10, 2019 and has a compliance date of June 30, 2020. Further testing of Reg BI would unduly interfere with and delay the implementation process which is already well underway. Ultimately, the bill would divert valuable and limited regulatory resources and thereby undermine the roll-out of a significantly strengthened best interest standard of conduct designed to better protect and serve retail investors.

Over the past several months, the SEC and FINRA have been working diligently to assist financial services firms in answering Reg BI interpretive questions and developing Reg BI compliance programs. Late last month, the SEC published a small entity compliance guide to Reg BI.4 Just last week, FINRA published a Reg BI compliance checklist and announced additional resources to aid firms in compliance.5

Continue reading >

1 SIFMA is the leading trade association for broker-dealers, investment banks and asset managers operating in the U.S. and global capital markets. On behalf of our industry’s nearly 1 million employees, we advocate for legislation, regulation and business policy, affecting retail and institutional investors, equity and fixed income markets and related products and services. We serve as an industry coordinating body to promote fair and orderly markets, informed regulatory compliance, and efficient market operations and resiliency. We also provide a forum for industry policy and professional development. SIFMA, with offices in New York and Washington, D.C., is the U.S. regional member of the Global Financial Markets Association (GFMA). For more information, visit http://www.sifma.org.

2 See https://www.sec.gov/about/offices/investorad/investor-testing-form-crs-relationship-summary.pdf.

3 See, e.g., Regulation Best Interest (SEC Release No. 34-83062; File No. S7-07-18); and Form CRS Relationship Summary, Amendments to Form ADV, Required Disclosures in Retail Communications and Restrictions on the use of Certain Names or Titles (SEC Release No. 34-83063; IA-4888; File No. S7-08-18).

4 See https://www.sec.gov/info/smallbus/secg/regulation-best-interest.

Details

Download

More Content

  • Amicus Briefs
    Oct 05, 2026

    In re The Boeing Company Securities Litigation

  • Letters
    Oct 05, 2026

    Reducing Duplicative Regulation and Expanding Exemptions for Commodity Pool Operators and Commodity Trading Advisors

    SIFMA AMG comments on CFTC proposals to reduce duplicative regulation for certain CPOs and CTAs and account for inflation.
  • Letters
    Sep 30, 2026

    Proposed Rule Change to Amend FINRA Rules 0150, 2165, 4512 and to Adopt FINRA Rule 2166

    SIFMA Comments to SEC in support of the proposed rule changes to improve the utilization of Rules 2165 and 4512, as well as the new Rule 2166 to allow for a temporary delay for suspected fraud.

Get the latest trends, stats, and research on financial markets and securities.