Governing the Give Up of a Clearing Trading Permit Holder
Summary
SIFMA provided comments to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on proposed rule change to amend Cboe Rule 6.21. In the Filing, Cboe proposes the requirement that an executing broker obtain authorization from a clearing firm prior to giving up that clearing firm for options transactions. SIFMA supports the Cboe proposal because it would reduce a significant source of risk for clearing firms.
See also:
Excerpt
Via Electronic Mail ([email protected])
Brent J. Fields
Secretary
Securities and Exchange Commission
100 F Street, N.E.
Washington, DC 20549
Re: Cboe Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Proposed Rule Change to Amend Cboe Rule 6.21 Governing the Give Up of a Clearing Trading Permit Holder by a Trading Permit Holder (File No. SR-CBOE-20 18-055)
Dear Mr. Fields:
The Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association (“SIFMA”) 1 appreciates the opportunity to comment on the above-referenced filing (the “Filing” or the “Cboe Filing”) made by Cboe Exchange, Inc. (“Cboe” or “Exchange”) with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC” or “Commission”). In the Filing, Cboe proposes to amend Rule 6.21 2 to require that an executing broker obtain authorization from a clearing firm prior to giving up that clearing firm for options transactions. SIFMA supports the Cboe proposal because it would reduce a significant source of risk for clearing firms.
Currently, Cboe Options Rule 6.2 1 requires that when a Trading Permit Holder (“TPH”) executes a trade on the Exchange, it must give up the name of a Clearing Trading Permit Holder (“CTPH”) through which the transaction will be cleared. This process does not require that the TPH receive authorization from the CTPH to be given up to the CTPH, and it does not allow a CTPH ability to prohibit a TPH from designating the CTPH as a give up. This process runs counter to those practices used by clearing firms to approve and onboard a new executing broker because Cboe does not require an agreement between the CTPH and the TPH before the
TPH can give up the CTPH.
SIFMA was approached by its clearing firm members to review the current give up practice since it is a significant source of risk. Accordingly, SIFMA began advocating with the Exchanges and SEC for a modification to the current practice and commends Cboe for addressing risks to clearing firms by amending the rule to prevent unauthorized give ups.
Under Cboe’s proposed rule, “TPHs will no longer be able to designate any CTPH for which they desire to give up. Rather, the Exchange proposes to provide that TPHs must first have written authorization from a CTPH before it may give up that CTPH.”3 SIFMA agrees with the proposed changes to Rule 6.2 1 including the elimination of the term “Designated Give Up.” SIFMA acknowledges that the replacement term “Authorized Give Up” is more applicable since the proposed rule requires authorization from the CTPH prior to a TPH being permitted to give up the clearing firm.
Cboe’s proposal is a critical first step to reduce risk in listed-options clearing. The current listed-options give up process can create unlimited risk since clearing firms have no ability to monitor credit limits and exposure before being given up. Under the Cboe proposed rule, clearing firms will have the ability to implement structural changes, i.e. agreements between the TPH and CTPH, that are consistent with basic principles of risk management. The new agreements will allow the clearing firm to properly assess and enforce credit limits for authorized executing brokers and their clients.
SIFMA agrees that the planned implementation date should occur no more than sixty (60) days following Commission approval.4 SIFMA members agree that this timeframe will provide CTPHs with ample time to authorize TPHs as give ups.