FINRA Regulatory Notice 18-06

Published on:
April 9, 2018
Submitted to:
FINRA
Submitted by:
SIFMA

Summary

SIFMA provided comments to FINRA on Regulatory Notice 18-06. SIFMA applauds FINRA’s efforts to amend its Membership Application Program rules to help ensure that arbitration claims, awards, and settlements are paid in full.

See also:

FINRA Requests Comment on Proposed Amendments to Its Membership Application Program to Incentivize Payment of Arbitration Awards

Excerpt

April 9, 2018

Via E-Mail to [email protected]

Jennifer Piorko Mitchell

Office of the Corporate Secretary

FINRA

1735 K Street, NW

Washington, DC 20006-1506

Re: Regulatory Notice 18-06 (proposed amendments to Membership Application

Program to incentivize payment of arbitration awards)

Dear Ms. Mitchell:

The Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association (“SIFMA”)1 appreciates the opportunity to comment on Notice 18-06 (the “Notice” or the “Proposal”). 2 We applaud FINRA’s efforts to amend its Membership Application Program rules to help ensure that arbitration claims, awards, and settlements are paid in full.

We have long held that the issue of unpaid awards originates with the integrity and quality control standards that FINRA establishes for membership. That is the most appropriate juncture and means to address the issue, rather than viewing the issue as requiring some form of post-award collection pool, insurance, or guaranty. We offer the following comments and recommendations for your consideration.

1. Membership applications are presumptively denied if there are pending arbitration claims.

NMA. SIFMA supports the presumption of denial for a new membership application (“NMA”) if the applicant or its associated persons are subject to pending arbitration claims. We likewise support the applicant’s ability to overcome the presumption of denial upon showing its ability to satisfy the pending arbitration claims through an escrow agreement, a clearing deposit, a guarantee, a reserve fund, or the retention of proceeds from an asset transfer.

If the applicant designates a clearing deposit or the proceeds from an asset transfer for purposes of demonstrating its ability to satisfy a pending arbitration claim, unpaid award, or unpaid settlement, then it would be appropriate for FINRA to require the applicant to provide some sort of written guaranty that the funds would be applied for that purpose.

We do not support overcoming the presumption of denial upon a showing of insurance coverage. It is erroneous to conflate insurance coverage with a respondent’s ability to pay an award. Most insurance policies do not in fact provide coverage for FINRA arbitration claims.

Most relevant insurance coverages generally exclude, for example, fraud claims and conduct outside the scope of employment (e.g., selling away). In addition, determining whether an insurance policy “may” apply to a claim (in terms of subject matter, policy limits, and coverage determinations) is often difficult based on the Statement of Claim and other information available during the pendency of a case. Thus, in many cases, it would be unclear whether the policy may cover the claim.

Moreover, even if the claim may be covered, it is uncertain whether the insurance company would make an affirmative coverage determination, much less one that would cover the full prospective arbitration award. In many cases, even at the time an award is made, many insurers have not yet provided an opinion on whether their policy would apply. For all the foregoing reasons, insurance policies should not be allowed to demonstrate an applicant’s ability to satisfy pending arbitration claims.

CMA. SIFMA agrees that the presumption of denial for pending arbitration claims should not apply to a continuing membership application (“CMA”). Instead, consistent with current practice, FINRA should consider pending arbitrations in determining if the applicant meets the standards for admission.

Continue Reading >

1 SIFMA is the voice of the U.S. securities industry. We represent the broker-dealers, banks and asset managers whose nearly 1 million employees provide access to the capital markets, raising over $2.5 trillion for businesses and municipalities in the U.S., serving clients with over $18.5 trillion in assets and managing more than $67 trillion in assets for individual and institutional clients including mutual funds and retirement plans. SIFMA, with offices in New York and Washington, D.C., is the U.S. regional member of the Global Financial Markets Association (GFMA). For more information, visit http://www.sifma.org.

2 Notice 18-06, available at http://www.finra.org/industry/notices/18-06

Details

Download

More Content

  • Amicus Briefs
    Oct 05, 2026

    In re The Boeing Company Securities Litigation

  • Letters
    Oct 05, 2026

    Reducing Duplicative Regulation and Expanding Exemptions for Commodity Pool Operators and Commodity Trading Advisors

    SIFMA AMG comments on CFTC proposals to reduce duplicative regulation for certain CPOs and CTAs and account for inflation.
  • Letters
    Sep 30, 2026

    Proposed Rule Change to Amend FINRA Rules 0150, 2165, 4512 and to Adopt FINRA Rule 2166

    SIFMA Comments to SEC in support of the proposed rule changes to improve the utilization of Rules 2165 and 4512, as well as the new Rule 2166 to allow for a temporary delay for suspected fraud.

Get the latest trends, stats, and research on financial markets and securities.