Data to Support Modernizing the Delivery Frameworks (SIFMA and SIFMA AMG)

Published on:
March 13, 2026
Submitted to:
SEC
Submitted by:
SIFMA and SIFMA AMG

Summary

SIFMA and SIFMA AMG submitted data to support SIFMA’s proposal submitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on September 15, 2025 requesting that the Commission take necessary steps to modernize the framework for the electronic delivery of required communications and disclosures by market participants to investors, customers, and clients.

Excerpt

The Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association 1 and its Asset Management Group 2 (collectively, “SIFMA”) are submitting data to support SIFMA’s proposal submitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC” or “Commission”) on September 15, 2025 requesting that the Commission take necessary steps to modernize the framework for the electronic delivery of required communications and disclosures by market participants to investors, customers, and clients (collectively, “customers”). 3 To further support the proposal, SIFMA requested data from members on costs of delivering investor documents and potential cost savings if the Commission were to permit firms to treat electronic delivery as the default delivery method for required customer communications. The survey respondents included large and medium-sized broker-dealers, investment advisers, and dual-registrants with retail clients. SIFMA also conducted a separate survey for institutional businesses including broker-dealers and asset managers.

1. SIFMA members spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually to deliver documents to retail investors via postal delivery.

SIFMA’s survey shows that firms are sending an average of 14 documents per retail account per year totaling billions of documents sent to retail investors. 4 The SIFMA survey showed that respondents spent on average $62 million per year on delivering documents to retail investors. Some large firms reported spending more than $130 million annually. Of these costs, over 95% were attributed to postal delivery – an average of about $60 million annually across all respondents, and as much as $144 million annually for large firms.

The cost of delivering paper documents by mail was reported to be an average of $1.45 per document. The cost of delivering electronic documents was less than 20 cents per document, and perhaps even less as some firms report that they have negotiated a flat fee for delivering electronic documents for customers who have opted in.

These results are further bolstered by the Commission’s own filing to the Office of Management and Budget on the costs of delivering trade confirmations under Rule 10b-10. 5 The Commission found that the industry pays over $20 billion annually to deliver paper confirmations to investors which accounts for 80% of the $25 billion total cost of delivering both paper and electronic confirmations.

Related Resource

  1. SIFMA is the leading trade association for broker-dealers, investment banks and asset managers operating in the U.S. and global capital markets. On behalf of our industry’s one million employees, we advocate on legislation, regulation and business policy affecting retail and institutional investors, equity and fixed income markets and related products and services. We serve as an industry coordinating body to promote fair and orderly markets, informed regulatory compliance, and efficient market operations and resiliency. We also provide a forum for industry policy and professional development. SIFMA, with offices in New York and Washington, D.C., is the U.S. regional member of the Global Financial Markets Association (GFMA).
     
  2. SIFMA’s Asset Management Group (SIFMA AMG) brings the asset management community together to provide views on U.S. and global policy and to create industry best practices. SIFMA AMG’s members represent U.S. and global asset management firms that manage more than 50% of global AUM. The clients of SIFMA AMG member firms include, among others, tens of millions of individual investors, registered investment companies, endowments, public and private pension funds, UCITS and private funds such as hedge funds and private equity funds. For more information, visit http://www.sifma.org/amg.
     
  3. SIFMA Letter to Chairman Atkins re: Modernizing Delivery Requirements Under the Federal Securities Laws (Sept. 15, 2025), https://www.sifma.org/advocacy/letters/modernizing-delivery-requirements-under-the-federal-securities-laws-sifma-and-sifma-amg.
     
  4. This number includes packages of documents so more than one document may be packaged with another document (e.g., certain disclosure documents may be packaged with a trade confirmation).
     
  5.  

Details

More Content

  • Letters
    Mar 13, 2026

    Small Entity Definition for Investment Advisers

    SIFMA provided comments to the SEC on its proposed amendments to the small entity definition for investment advisers for purposes of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
  • Amicus Briefs
    Mar 11, 2026

    Robinhood Markets, Inc. v. Sodha

  • Letters
    Mar 09, 2026

    FINRA Regulatory Notice 26-02

    SIFMA comments on FINRA’s regulatory notice 26-02, supporting stronger fraud protections and recommending implementation flexibility.

Get the latest trends, stats, and research on financial markets and securities.