D.C. Data Privacy Protection Bill

Published on:
November 8, 2019

Summary

SIFMA provided feedback on B23-215, the D.C. Data Privacy Protection Bill which would generally modernize the District’s data breach law while keeping the law in line with similar requirements across the country. SIFMA generally supports such efforts and commends Attorney General Racine and the Council on their efforts in this space. 

Excerpt

The Honorable Phil Mendelson

Chair, Council of the District of Columbia

Chair, Committee of the Whole

Wilson Building, Room 412

1350 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.

Washington, DC 20004

RE: DC B23-215, A Bill Regarding Data Privacy Protection

Dear Chair Mendelson:

The Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association1 is a national trade association which brings together the shared interests of over 340 broker-dealers, banks and asset managers, many of whom have a strong presence in the District of Columbia. We thank you for the opportunity to provide feedback on B23-215, which would generally modernize the District’s data breach law while keeping the law in line with similar requirements across the country.

SIFMA generally supports such efforts and commends Attorney General Racine and the Council on their efforts in this space. Below we have included several suggestions for your review that would both strengthen consumer protections and increase the proposed framework’s efficiency:

• The Need to Expand the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act Compliance Provision

The current law states that entities subject to Title V of the GLBA, and who provide notice of a breach in accordance with that Act, are deemed to be compliant with the District’s law. As currently drafted, B23-215 would add two new provisions to the existing law, both of which would be outside of the GLBA deemed-compliance provision: notification to the District Attorney General, and an additional security requirement. We urge you to consider expanding the GLBA deemed-compliance provision to include both provisions, or at least modifying the notification provision, for the reasons discussed below.

Continue Reading

Details

Download

More Content

  • Amicus Briefs
    Oct 05, 2026

    In re The Boeing Company Securities Litigation

  • Letters
    Oct 05, 2026

    Reducing Duplicative Regulation and Expanding Exemptions for Commodity Pool Operators and Commodity Trading Advisors

    SIFMA AMG comments on CFTC proposals to reduce duplicative regulation for certain CPOs and CTAs and account for inflation.
  • Letters
    Sep 30, 2026

    Proposed Rule Change to Amend FINRA Rules 0150, 2165, 4512 and to Adopt FINRA Rule 2166

    SIFMA Comments to SEC in support of the proposed rule changes to improve the utilization of Rules 2165 and 4512, as well as the new Rule 2166 to allow for a temporary delay for suspected fraud.

Get the latest trends, stats, and research on financial markets and securities.