California Privacy Rights Act of 2020 Proposed Rulemaking

Published on:
November 8, 2021
Submitted to:
CPPA
Submitted by:
SIFMA

Summary

SIFMA provided comments to the California Privacy Protection Agency (CPPA) in response to their Invitation for Preliminary Comments on Proposed Rulemaking under the California Privacy Rights Act of 2020 (CPRA).

Excerpt

November 8, 2021

California Privacy Protection Agency

Attn: Debra Castanon

915 Capitol Mall, Suite 350A

Sacramento, CA 95814

Re: Invitation for Preliminary Comments on Proposed Rulemaking under the California Privacy Rights Act of 2020 (Proceeding No. 01-21)

Dear Ms. Castanon:

The Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association (“SIFMA”)1 welcomes the opportunity to respond to the California Privacy Protection Agency (“CPPA”) Invitation for Preliminary Comments on Proposed Rulemaking under the California Privacy Rights Act of 2020 (”CPRA”).2 SIFMA previously provided comments on the Attorney General’s rulemaking under the California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018 (“CCPA”).3 SIFMA and its members are strongly committed to the protection of consumer data, privacy, and security, and its members have operated for years under the well-established protections of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act. SIFMA is responding to several of your specific requests but is also providing some additional thoughts on what other areas may be ripe for additional guidance from the CPPA.

1. Audits and Risk Assessments

SIFMA members perform audits and risk assessments for many purposes – including privacy and data protection – under various federal and state mandates. SIFMA believes that any additional rulemaking or guidance provided on when a covered business meets the “significant risk to consumers’ privacy or security” standard for initiating a risk assessment should focus on factors that should be considered in making this determination, which may align with triggers for other audits or risk assessments. Further, internal audits should satisfy the requirements so long as they meet the audit industry standards, thus balancing the need to provide or obtain relevant information without placing an undue burden on businesses, especially small businesses. In further developing any guidance on audits and assessments, the CPPA should consider implementing requirements similar to the requirements adopted by the New York State Department of Financial Services (“NYDFS”) under 23 NYCRR Part 500 or Europe’s General Data Protection Act (“GDPR”) audit requirements. Many SIFMA members are currently complying with such audit and reporting requirements thus making compliance with a similar requirement in California more seamless and efficient in both jurisdictions. Further the NYDFS rules provide sufficient flexibility based on a company’s industry, size, locations, activities, etc.

SIFMA does not believe that additional rulemaking is necessary for assessing risks to consumer privacy versus benefits of businesses processing data, but additional guidance may be beneficial for further clarifying how the CPPA expects firms to make those assessments.

Continue reading

1 SIFMA is the leading trade association for broker-dealers, investment banks, and asset managers operating in the

U.S. and global capital markets. On behalf of our members, we advocate for legislation, regulation, and business

policy affecting retail and institutional investors, equity and fixed income markets, and related products and

services. We serve as an industry coordinating body to promote fair and orderly markets, informed regulatory

compliance, and efficient market operations and resiliency. We also provide a forum for industry policy and

professional development. SIFMA, with offices in New York and Washington, D.C., is the U.S. regional member of

the Global Financial Markets Association (GFMA).

2 Invitation for Preliminary Comments on Proposed Rulemaking under the California Privacy Rights Act of 2020

(Proceeding No. 01-21) (September 22, 2021), https://cppa.ca.gov/regulations/pdf/invitation_for_comments.pdf

3 Letter from Melissa MacGregor, SIFMA to The Honorable Xavier Becerra (December 6, 2019),

https://www.sifma.org/resources/submissions/proposed-california-consumer-privacy-act-regulations-ccpa-rules/.

Details

Download

More Content

  • Amicus Briefs
    Oct 05, 2026

    In re The Boeing Company Securities Litigation

  • Letters
    Oct 05, 2026

    Reducing Duplicative Regulation and Expanding Exemptions for Commodity Pool Operators and Commodity Trading Advisors

    SIFMA AMG comments on CFTC proposals to reduce duplicative regulation for certain CPOs and CTAs and account for inflation.
  • Letters
    Sep 30, 2026

    Proposed Rule Change to Amend FINRA Rules 0150, 2165, 4512 and to Adopt FINRA Rule 2166

    SIFMA Comments to SEC in support of the proposed rule changes to improve the utilization of Rules 2165 and 4512, as well as the new Rule 2166 to allow for a temporary delay for suspected fraud.

Get the latest trends, stats, and research on financial markets and securities.