Wilson v. Merrill Lynch

Published on:
July 8, 2011

SIFMA submitted an Amicus “Friend of the Court” Brief.

Court:

U.S. Court of Appeals

(Second Circuit)

Amicus Brief Issue:

What types of disclosures would, as a matter of law, preclude plaintiff from pleading the “manipulative acts” element of a market manipulation claim?  Would allegations that the defendant firm manipulated ARS auctions preclude plaintiff from pleading market efficiency for purposes of establishing the “fraud on the market” presumption of reliance?  What types of disclosures would rebut the presumption of “fraud on the market” (based upon market efficiency)?  What types of disclosure would, as a matter of law, preclude plaintiff from pleading that he justifiably relied on an assumption of the ARS market’s integrity?

Counsel of Record:

Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker LLP

William F. Sullivan

Howard Privette

Barry G. Sher

Stephen B. Kinnaird

D. Scott Carlton

Other Amici on SIFMA’s Brief: 

None

Details

Download

More Content

  • Amicus Briefs
    Oct 05, 2026

    In re The Boeing Company Securities Litigation

  • Letters
    Oct 05, 2026

    Reducing Duplicative Regulation and Expanding Exemptions for Commodity Pool Operators and Commodity Trading Advisors

    SIFMA AMG comments on CFTC proposals to reduce duplicative regulation for certain CPOs and CTAs and account for inflation.
  • Letters
    Sep 30, 2026

    Proposed Rule Change to Amend FINRA Rules 0150, 2165, 4512 and to Adopt FINRA Rule 2166

    SIFMA Comments to SEC in support of the proposed rule changes to improve the utilization of Rules 2165 and 4512, as well as the new Rule 2166 to allow for a temporary delay for suspected fraud.

Get the latest trends, stats, and research on financial markets and securities.