Wilson v. Merrill Lynch

Published on:
July 8, 2011

SIFMA submitted an Amicus “Friend of the Court” Brief.

Court:

U.S. Court of Appeals

(Second Circuit)

Amicus Brief Issue:

What types of disclosures would, as a matter of law, preclude plaintiff from pleading the “manipulative acts” element of a market manipulation claim?  Would allegations that the defendant firm manipulated ARS auctions preclude plaintiff from pleading market efficiency for purposes of establishing the “fraud on the market” presumption of reliance?  What types of disclosures would rebut the presumption of “fraud on the market” (based upon market efficiency)?  What types of disclosure would, as a matter of law, preclude plaintiff from pleading that he justifiably relied on an assumption of the ARS market’s integrity?

Counsel of Record:

Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker LLP

William F. Sullivan

Howard Privette

Barry G. Sher

Stephen B. Kinnaird

D. Scott Carlton

Other Amici on SIFMA’s Brief: 

None

Details

Download

More Content

  • Letters
    Oct 22, 2026

    Treasury/IRS Notice 2026-49: Guidance on Section 324 of the SECURE 2.0 Act with Respect to Rollovers

    SIFMA supports modernizing retirement plan rollovers through standardized electronic processes, fraud safeguards and appropriate implementation timelines.
  • Amicus Briefs
    Oct 21, 2026

    In re USD LIBOR Litigation

  • Letters
    Oct 20, 2026

    SEC’s Proposed Rule Regulation Crypto Assets

    SIFMA and SIFMA AMG provide recommendations to the SEC on its proposed crypto asset regulation, addressing regulatory clarity, implementation and investor protection.

Get the latest trends, stats, and research on financial markets and securities.